I Spit On Your Grave Review

A Thomas Bess review of:
I Spit On Your Grave


Directed By: Steven R. Monroe

Starring: Sarah Butler, Jeff Branson, Andrew Howard, Daniel Franzese, Rodney Eastman, Chad Lindberg

Running Time: 107 minutes, 20 or so of which involve nothing but rape.


I Spit On Your Grave. Is there a better title for a horror movie? Or perhaps I should ask, is there any better formula for creating evocative titles? Think about it. Take the “I (verb) on your (noun)” formula and see what sort of fun you can have. Some of my personal favorites include “I pee on your carport”, (and yes, that’s carport, not carpet, though that’s not without merit) “I hurl on your hammock” and “I feast on your terrier”. Honorable mentions go to “I shoot your face” and “I shoot your face again”, even though they don’t strictly adhere to what I will now refer to as the “On Your” formula of title creation. Back to the flick at hand. What we’ve got here is a remake of the 70’s exploitation classic and while I’d wager it won’t pack the same sort of startling punch for folks who’ve seen the original, it’s still a well crafted shocker that’s home to one of the most intense / prolonged scenes of rape and degradation I’ve ever seen. I mean, I thought the sequence in the new Last House on the Left was rough, but ISOYG leaves it in the rearview. And while it’s hard to say you actually enjoyed a film with such disturbing content, there’s enough good therein to give it an endorsement to those who think they’re up for the challenge.

The Plot

For those of you unfamiliar with the plot, here’s a synopsis presented in a catchy, non-haiku format. Jennifer Hills (Butler) is a writer from the city who’s rented a nice cabin out in the country so she’ll have a quiet place to relax while finishing her latest project. En route to said cabin, she stops at a nearby gas station and runs afoul of some local goons, (Franzese, Eastman) lead by Johnny (Branson). Brushing them off with far more grace and civility than they deserve, she heads out to the cabin and settles in for some R&R. Meanwhile, the yahoos from the gas station, simmering over “the city chick” on their turf, start plotting and before you can say home invasion they’ve busted into Jennifer’s digs. Cue some very unpleasant behavior and ethically questionable involvement from local law enforcement. After barely escaping her suddenly lackadaisical captors, our traumatized heroine flees into the woods and proceeds to vanish for most of the second act so the jerks can stew about what they’ve done. Eventually watching and waiting proves too passive, so she emerges from the forest primeval and proceeds to dispatch her assailants with a series of simple, yet brutally creative deathtraps, one of which will make you walk funny just looking at it.

The Good


What’s good? Sarah Butler’s turn as Jennifer is excellent, which is itself another good thing considering that the whole story would’ve fallen apart if the audience didn’t empathize with her plight. But that’s never an issue here as Butler runs her heroine through a whole range of mental states, starting with meek, then moving to terrified but defiant before finishing up as chillingly vengeful. The antagonists are a pretty solid group too, with special mention going out to Andrew Howard as the reprehensible sheriff and Chad Lindberg as the poor slow fella who gets pulled into the maelstrom despite his best efforts. The means by which Jennifer takes her revenge are for the most part pretty neat, bringing to mind the “games” in the first installment of SAW. (You know, the ones that could be set up by one person and not a whole team of Disney Imagineers.) To actually describe them would be too spoiler-tastic for my tastes, but let’s just say that you’ll never look at shears or fishhooks the same way again. As for the gore inflicted by these creations, the camera doesn’t linger quite as long as you might expect, but rest assured there is plenty of grue and splatter to satisfy your craving for the red stuff.

The Not So Good


So what’s not good? My biggest problems lie with the character of Jennifer (not Butler’s performance) but a few things we as an audience are expected to believe. In the beginning for example, she’s obviously someone who is not uncomfortable in the woods, but very much out of her element (the wind in the trees and a banging shed door seem to give her the willies). Thusly it’s hard to swallow that an urbanite, (one dealing with the aftereffects of a brutal sexual assault no less) would be able to survive in the woods for a month, let alone elude the local creeps searching for her. Along similar lines, while I have no problem imagining that she could rig these traps up by herself, how the hell did she stumble upon the knowledge to build them? Methinks a great solution to this problem would’ve been to reveal that Miz. Hills was the creator of some lurid pulp horror series, one that required research into death traps and all sorts of other terrible arcana. Even a glimpse of such a book in her possession (or better yet, her attackers discover it and start to worry) would’ve been more logical than the other idea presented, namely that being gang-raped and left for dead can turn you into Rambo.

Should You See It?


Should you see it? Well it’s not going to be for everyone, that’s for sure. The end of the first act alone will turn a lot of stomachs and the carnage in the finale isn’t exactly a bundle of sweetness and light either. If you’re in the mood for a good revenge flick and can handle the brutality, this is one you shouldn’t pass by, or spit on for that matter. That said, if you’re going to watch it with a group, make absolutely certain you let them know what they’re getting into, otherwise you may find yourself short a few friends before the night is over. Oh and though horror can lead to snuggling if your significant other is rather jumpy, this is probably one best avoided on date night.

The Verdict


Since I couldn’t think of anything even remotely appropriate to use as a scale, I’m going to take the easy way out and give I Spit On Your Grave four murdered sleazebags out of five.


Until next time, always remember that the calls are coming from inside the house.

Tom Bess recently shaved his legendary sideburns at a cost of two hours and five pounds. The end result is a slightly puffier, but much more aerodynamic movie-reviewing machine who is still patiently waiting for Allison Mack to return his calls. While he’s waiting, he’ll read copious amounts of Lovecraft and eat too many Peach Gummy Bears.


Other Things You Might Find Interesting

  • Thomas Bess Recommends House (1977)
    Thomas Bess recommends a film made in 1977 that, despite doing so with countless movies before, he has trouble describing it. Read More →
  • My Soul To Take Review
    My Soul to Take is a pretty entertaining (albeit rather different) yarn, but there’s just enough problems salted throughout to keep it from being as effective as it could have been. Read More →
  • Frozen Review
    At the very least it’ll make you wary of ski-lift operators and other everyday folks who have some sort of casual control over your wellbeing. That might sound like a paranoid way to live but hey, when was the last time you heard about a paranoiac stumbling into a situation where they could freeze to death or be devoured by wolves all in the same evening? Yeah, that’s what I thought. Read More →
  • Hatchet 2 Review
    If you enjoy the classic slasher formula and gore that makes the most brutal Mortal Kombat fatalities look like a Hallmark card accompanied by a warm slice of your grandma’s apple pie, you need to get your hands on a copy of Hatchet 2 and drag all your likeminded friends along for the ride. Read More →
  • Let Me In Review
    Knowing that Let Me In wasn’t so much a horror yarn as it was a study of adolescent turmoil where one of the characters just happens to be a vampire allowed me to enjoy the story much more and raise my appreciation for the original at the same time, a win-win in my book. Read More →
  • Devil Review
    Despite the fact that he’s just a producer on this one, Shyamalan will be getting the lion’s share of attention for its success or failure, which is a shame, because if anyone deserves to see their stock rise in the wake of this outing, it’s Dowdle and not the dude who brought us killer pollen and the most poorly-planned alien invasion in the history of cinema. Read More →
  • Last Exorcism Review
    Thankfully, Daniel Stamm’s The Last Exorcism is an original, interesting entry whose only real problem comes in the last five minutes. Read More →
  • Burning Bright Review
    Kids. Man-eating tiger. Hurricane. Boarded-up house. If that combination makes you smile then by all means track down a copy of soon as possible. Read More →

Leave a Reply

 

 

 

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>